Legal Opinion
In Re Adam
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1997No. 96-L-138PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William M. O’Neill, Judge.
This is an accelerated calendar appeal submitted on the briefs of both parties.
Appellant, an alleged delinquent child, appeals from a judgment of the Juvenile Division of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas adjudicating him delinquent for possessing drug paraphernalia, a misdemeanor of the fourth degree if committed by an adult, in violation of R.C. 2925.14. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows. In June 1995, appellant was a student enrolled at Mentor High School. Appellant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- In Re DenggOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re DenggOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Mayeux v. Bd. of Edn. Painesville, 2007-L-099 (3-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008