Hashimoto v. American Union Line, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
At Daw. Action by Hashimoto, Esq., against the American Union Eine, Inc. Jury waived. Judgment for plaintiff, less items of counterclaim allowed.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
The court has found as a fact that the Shigizan Maru was delayed in Genoa during March and April, 1917, for 1% days, and that this delay was caused by a broken winch on the *749port side of No. 3 hatch. The court has further found as a fact, in accordance with the stipulation of counsel, that the Shigizan Maru was delayed at Philadelphia in May, 1917, for one day and for the same reason. On the basis of these findings, it remains for the court to decide whether or not the defendant, as assignee of the charterer, is entitled to recover anything by reason of these delays.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Work v. LeathersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Munson S. S. Line v. Miramar S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1907
- Munson S. S. Line v. Miramar S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908