Legal Opinion

Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided June 25, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00840Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORY, LP Case No.: 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS 12 LITIGATION. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 RECONSIDERATION. 14 (ECF No. 204.) 15 16 Before the Court is Tauler Smith, LLP’s (“Tauler Smith”) motion for 17 reconsideration, (ECF No. 204), of the Court’s April 23, 2020 Order denying three 18 motions, including as relevant here, Tauler Smith’s motion to dismiss the second 19 amended counterclaims and third-party complaint brought by the Stores. (ECF No. 190.) 20 In sum, Tauler Smith asserts that the Court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Navajo Nation v. James W. Norris Gayle Norris v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Plaintiff-Intervenor. Navajo Nation v. James W. Norris Gayle Norris v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Plaintiff-Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API