Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 12, 2010No. D086062M; A142260PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment extending her probation from one year to five years, arguing, among other things, that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering the extension without a hearing and without determining that the purposes of her probation were not being served. The state asserts that the case must be remanded to the trial court because, in its view, the record does not demonstrate the basis for the court’s order. We conclude that the record is sufficiently developed and that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we reverse the court’s order.

On April 2, 2009,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barker v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. StanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LaizureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API