State v. Stanford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Defendant appeals from an order that extended and modified the terms of his probation. He assigns as error that the trial court found that he had violated one of the conditions of his probation. We affirm.
Defendant is a physician who was convicted of criminally negligent homicide. ORS 163.145. The trial court placed him on probation for three years. One of the conditions of probation was that he “[o]bey all laws, municipal, county, state and federal.” ORS 137.540(1)(j). Another condition was that he “report immediately to the Polk County Mental Health Clinic for evaluation and if medical,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barker v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BerglundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. StuveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. VanlieuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. StanfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.