Legal Opinion

Alt v. Franceski

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided September 29, 2004No. 02-CIV-5474Published

1Opinion of the Court

CORBETT, J.,

— And now, after consideration of the defendant’s motion for post-trial relief, the plaintiffs’ answer, the briefs of both parties and *243oral argument, it is the decision of this court that the motion for post-trial relief is denied for the reasons set forth herein:

I. BRIEF FACTS

Trial in this matter began on January 6,2004, and concluded two days later on January 8,2004, with a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The jury awarded a total of $154,000, $137,000 to Rosemary Alt and $17,000 to Arthur Alt. The jury awarded damages to Rosemary Alt for pain and suffering in the amount of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API