Legal Opinion

Ester Salinas v. Pat Townsend and Norberto Salinas

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 6, 2011No. 13-09-00421-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Memorandum Opinion by

Justice GARZA.

Appellant, Ester Salmas, was found liable for slandering appellees, the current and former mayors of Mission, Texas. Appellant challenges the judgment by six issues, contending that: (1) her speech was constitutionally protected; (2) her statements were not, as a matter of law, unambiguous defamatory statements of fact; (3) appellees did not prove mental anguish; (4) appellees did not prove that her statements were made with actual malice; (5) there was a fatal variance between the pleadings and the proof; and (6) the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Salinas v. SalinasTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Downing v. Burns, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  3. Deborah Downing v. Don Burns and Sherry Burns, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  4. Downing v. Burns, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. Ester Salinas v. Pat Townsend and Norberto Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API