Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1979No. 78-1378PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

As a preliminary matter, this court must determine whether appellant has properly preserved for review the purported error of the trial court in this cause. The difficulty arises from the wording of appellant’s assignment of error in the Court of Appeals:

“The trial court erred in overruling defendant-appellant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal as the making of an unsworn false oral statement to a police officer is not conduct punishable by R.C.G.O. Section 131.02 (A).”

At the conclusion of the prosecution’s case-in-chief, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal, pursuant to Crim. R. 29.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mac T. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. Herbert Lee PittsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. City of Columbus v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. United States v. George Besase, John Besase, Sam Besase, Ted Malson, Angelo Perna and Sam RappaportCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  5. State v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. MileyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. LazzaroOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. Pepin-McCaffreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. CoeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API