Legal Opinion

Leask v. Hinrichs

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 1992No. 2-91-0671PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiff, Sheila Leask, individually and as special administrator of the estate of Barbara Andrews, appeals the dismissal with prejudice of Dr. Anthony F. Altimari (Dr. Altimari) as a party defendant to her negligence suit. The trial court held that plaintiff’s third amended complaint failed to comply with the requirements of section 2 — 622 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 110, par. 2 — 622). The court also denied plaintiff leave to amend the complaint. Plaintiff appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (134 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)) and argues that the trial court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrochuIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. DeLuna v. St. Elizabeth's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. McCastle v. SheinkopIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Taylor v. City of BeardstownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Premo v. FalconeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Apa v. RotmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  2. Calamari v. DrammisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Cuthbertson v. AxelrodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Moscardini v. Neurosurg, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Fox v. GautoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API