Kuriger v. Joest
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Yanderburgh Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
— The record was filed in this court J anuary 7, 1897, and appellees’ brief was not filed till November 17, 1898. The appellant was plaintiff below, and the only question presented by the record is the sufficiency of the complaint. The complaint was originally in four paragraphs, but the first was withdrawal. The second, third, and fourth paragraphs of complaint wmre challenged by a demurrer, which was sustained. Appellant refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered against him for costs. The ruling on the demurrer is assigned as error.
Counsel for appellant in their brief have so fully,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Continental National Bank v. National Bank of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- President of the Salem Bank v. President of the Gloucester BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Wheeler v. New Brunswick & Canada RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First State Bank ex rel. Oelke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Steele v. Michigan Buggy Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Pierce v. VansellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Evans v. OdemIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Farmers' Bank v. OrrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.