Morris v. . Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee CtjRiam.
Evidence of speed in excess of tbe statutory limits is prima facie evidence “that tbe speed is not reasonable or prudent and that it is unlawful.” Public Laws 1935, cb. 311, sec. 2. It is, therefore, prima facie evidence of negligence. Woods v. Freeman, 213 N. C., 314. A prima facie showing carries tbe case to tbe jury for it to say whether or not tbe crucial and necessary facts have been established; Woods v. Freeman, supra; Cox v. R. R., 149 N. C., 117, 62 S. E., 884; Brock v. Ins. Co., 156 N. C., 112, 72 S. E., 213; unless plaintiff’s evidence is such that tbe conclusion that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cox v. Aberdeen & Asheboro R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Mulford v. Cotton States Hotel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Woods v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Brock v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Templeton v. . KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Humphries v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Barnes v. . TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Barnes v. TeerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.