Legal Opinion

Cox v. Aberdeen & Asheboro R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1908PublishedCited by 43 opinions

ActioN tried before Webb, J., and a jury, July Term/ 1908, of Randolph. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbis action was brought to recover damages for burning the plaintiff’s, timber. There was a verdict for the plaintiff and judgment was rendered thereon. Defendant appealed. , The evidence tended to ‘show that the fire was caused by sparks emitted from one of the defendant’s engines. With respect to this evidence, the Court charged the jury as follows: “If you find from the evidence that the fire which' injured the plaintiff’s property escaped from the defendant’s engine, there is a presumption in law of negligence on the' part of the defendant in the operation of its train, and in that event,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Carpet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Womble v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Ross v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Board of Education v. MakelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API