Legal Opinion

David v. David

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 17, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

We concur for the most part in the results reached by the advisory master, and for the reasons stated by him.

But we conclude that the amount of the second counsel fee allowed, $500, is excessive and that it should be reduced to $150. We think also that the allowance of $30 per week alimony was, under the circumstances, excessive, and that it should be reduced to $20 per week. With the above modifications the decrees brought up will be affirmed. No costs will be allowed.

For modification — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. Busch v. BuschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API