Legal Opinion

Imperial Plan, Inc., a Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1996No. 94-56439PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAVY, Circuit Judge:

Imperial Plan, Inc. appeals the district court’s dismissal of its action seeking a refund of excise taxes paid under 26 U.S.C. § 4975. The district court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Imperial Plan had not timely filed a claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Imperial Plan (IP) and Imperial Trust Company (ITC) are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Imperial Bank. From 1981 through 1984, ITC served as a fiduciary for. a number of pension…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seven Resorts, Inc., Dba Bridge Bay Resort v. James Arthur Cantlen Delta Upsilon, an Unincorporated Fraternal Organization Stacey Lynn EppingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Robin & Diane Miller, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Keeter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1997
  3. Clift v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016
  4. Danoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. O'Toole v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API