Legal Opinion

Lenzi v. Morkin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 25, 1983No. 82-2037PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

Ronald G. Lenzi and Geraldine J. Lenzi (plaintiffs) brought this action against Ruth A. Morkin, individually, as co-executor of the estate of Alma Dalmar, and as co-trustee of the Alma Dalmar 1979 trust (defendant). Plaintiffs allege failure of defendant to disclose an assessor’s revaluation of property purchased by plaintiffs from defendant. The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 110, par. 2—619.) Plaintiffs appeal.

In adjudicating a motion to dismiss, all facts well pleaded in the complaint are accepted as true. Steinberg v.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Broberg v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Schek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Sunstream Jet Express, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. International Air Service Co., Ltd., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Echo, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. The Whitson Company, Inc. D/B/A Power Tool Company, a Tennessee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Lenzi v. MorkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Metalex Corporation, an Illinois Corporation v. Uniden Corporation of America, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Czarobski v. LataIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API