Forbes v. Haynes
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARDGETT, Judge.
Habeas corpus. Petitioner is a prisoner in an institution within the Missouri Department of Corrections. He alleges his imprisonment is unlawful for the reason his term has expired. A writ was issued and a return filed thereto. The issue concerns the applicability of the mandatory consecutive sentencing provision of § 222.020, as amended 1959, to a person sen*487tenced to the Missouri Department of Corrections and who commits a subsequent offense while free on bond pending appeal. Is petitioner “under sentence” while his appeal is pending and when free on bond pending appeal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- Anthony v. KaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- King v. SwensonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Zinna v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- State v. CooperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Caffey v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1974
- Smith v. SwensonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.