Legal Opinion

State v. Och

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 21, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

852 A.2d 1143 (2004)

371 N.J. Super. 274

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff,

v.

William S. OCH, Jr., Defendant-Respondent.

In the Matter of the Application of Middle Township Board of Education, Movant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued Telephonically May 18, 2004.

Decided July 21, 2004.

James B. Arsenault, Vineland, Jr., argued the cause for appellant (Cooper, Levenson, April, Niedelman & Wagenheim, attorneys; Mr. Arsenault, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael L. Testa argued the cause for respondent William S. Och, Jr. (Basile & Testa, attorneys; Mr. Testa, of counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flagg v. Essex County ProsecutorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. State v. McQuaidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. State v. BellamySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  4. Moore v. Youth Correctional InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. State v. MedinaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MaldonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  2. State v. HupkaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  3. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. HOWARD B. SIDORSKY (005-06-18, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API