Legal Opinion
Patterson v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 23, 1962No. 15989PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
Appellants sought to enjoin the City of Dallas from enforcing the provisions of Section 8-28 of the Code of Civil and Criminal Ordinances of the City of Dallas, said Section of the City Code being a part of a comprehensive Ordinance regulating the operation of massage establishments. The Section of the Code under attack reads as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person to administer a massage as defined in Section 8-12 to any person of the opposite sex; provided, however, that this Section shall not apply to any Chiropractor, nor shall it apply to any registered physical…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Stansberry v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Kisley v. City of Falls ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Smith v. KeatorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Cheek v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Alobaidi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.