Legal Opinion

White v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 4, 1913No. 2,347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi; Henry C. Niles, Judge. Action by the United States against W. M. White and others, as executors of J. J. White, deceased. Judgment for the United States, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

Tins was an action by the United States, as plaintiff in the court below, defendant in error in this court, against the intestate of the plaintiffs in error and others, for damages for cutting and converting timber from the lands of the United States. The principal question in controversy in the court below was as to which of the various defendants sued cut the timber, the cutting of which was complained of by the plaintiff. So *502far as the errors assigned relate to the question of the liability of the intestate of the plaintiffs in error; we find them to be without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Galigher v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Eddy v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arizona & N. M. Ry. Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Arnold v. HorriganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. Hammond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  4. United States v. CarlsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API