Legal Opinion
Comberiate v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 19, 1973No. 335-72PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKxnsrzio, Judge
The question before us in this civilian pay case is whether plaintiff’s geographical reassignment between installations of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was lawful. We are also confronted with the further question of whether his removal from the competitive Civil Service for refusing to accept the subject reassignment was supported by substantial evidence and not arbitrary, capricious, or grossly erroneous.
We hold for the Government. The reassignment was lawful and the removal supported by substantial evidence.
Plaintiff is a preference eligible veteran with a record…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Daniel S. Urbina v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Frank Camero v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- William Clyde Burton v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Schmidt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Qualls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Edward I. Leefer v. Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Garbacz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Gary K. Frey v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Craig v. ColburnDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.