William Clyde Burton v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Judge.
This back pay action is before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. There is no cross-motion. The alternatives therefore are to allow the motion and dismiss the complaint, or to deny the motion and order trial. We allow the motion and dismiss the complaint. We believe there is no triable issue of fact and under the undisputed facts plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The evidence is documentary, including recorded testimony.
Plaintiff, a Negro, following certification by the Civil Service Commission, was appointed an Engineer, SP 9-175, Level 15, with the Engineering…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Madison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Dorothy B. Louks v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
3Cited by20 opinions
- Boyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- James B. Nagel v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Michael G. Heffron v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Burton v. PeartreeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.