Legal Opinion

William Clyde Burton v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 13, 1968No. 246-67PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Judge.

This back pay action is before us on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. There is no cross-motion. The alternatives therefore are to allow the motion and dismiss the complaint, or to deny the motion and order trial. We allow the motion and dismiss the complaint. We believe there is no triable issue of fact and under the undisputed facts plaintiff is not entitled to recover. The evidence is documentary, including recorded testimony.

Plaintiff, a Negro, following certification by the Civil Service Commission, was appointed an Engineer, SP 9-175, Level 15, with the Engineering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Madison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Dorothy B. Louks v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Boyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. James B. Nagel v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Michael G. Heffron v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Burton v. PeartreeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API