Legal Opinion
Feijo v. Harte Toyota, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided December 20, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wheatley, PJ.
The plaintiff (Feijo), unsuccessful in an attempt to buy a car from Harte Toyota, Inc. (Harte), has sued for breach of contract and a violation of G.L.c. 93A, the Consumer Protection Act.2 The trial judge found for Harte on the contract claim, and against Harte on the 93A count. The case reaches this court on an agreed statement of facts, under Dist./Mun. R. A. D. A., Rule 8B. We affirm the appeal in part and remand to the trial court.
We recite the facts gleaned from the Agreed Statement and the trial court’s Findings, Rulings and Orders.3 While shopping for a used pickup truck…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Levings v. Forbes & Wallace, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKeown v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Valley Children's Hospital v. Athenahealth, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Valley Eye Physicians and Surgeons P.C. v. Modernizing Medicine Billing Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025