Legal Opinion
Kuga v. Chang
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 11, 1991No. Record 900617PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SENIOR JUSTICE POFF
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The principal question raised on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding that a real estate agent was entitled to the commission fixed in the contract of employment when the purchaser, who was ready, willing, and able to perform at the time the contract was executed, later repudiated the contract and refused to perform.
We review the evidence adduced in a bench trial. In March 1987, Robert and Holly Kuga signed an agreement with Manor Homes of Virginia, Inc. (MHVA), listing their home for sale. The listing agreement provided…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Massie v. FirmstoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Reiber v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Campbell v. SickelsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Kingsland Land Corp. v. LangeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Terry v. BishopSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heider v. ClemonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Shalimar Development, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Robertson v. CommonwealthRichmond County Circuit Court · 1993
- Huntsberry Realty Co. v. MorganWinchester County Circuit Court · 1991