Legal Opinion

Estopinal v. Parish of St. Bernard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 2014No. 2013-CA-1561PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRI F. LOVE, Judge.

| ¡This appeal arises from the allegedly unconstitutional and unlawful condemnation of properties severely damaged by Hurricane Katrina located in St. Bernard Parish. The plaintiffs allege that a class action lawsuit is the proper procedural vehicle to seek recompense. The trial court found that variables between the plaintiffs precluded the usage of the class action procedure and denied their motion to certify the class. We find that a class action lawsuit is an inappropriate procedural device for these plaintiffs because commonality; typicality, adequacy, ascertainable…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. McCastle v. Rollins Environmental Services of La., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  4. Ford v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  5. Stevens v. Bd. of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claborne v. Housing Authority of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Anderson v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API