Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1896No. Nos. 9851-(354)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Proceeding in the district court for Renville county by Joseph Smith to contest the validity of an election held July 18, 1894, for changing the county seat of said county. The matter was tried before Webber, J., who found that the county seat was changed by the election. From a judgment entered in pursuance of such findings, the contestant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This was a county-seat contest, in which findings of fact and conclusions of law were made and filed in the court below. Pursuant thereto, judgment was entered changing and removing the county seat of Renville county from the village of Beaver Falls, at which place it had theretofore been, to the village of Olivia, and this appeal is from such judgment.

Three questions have been presented and discussed by counsel for the contestant and contestee, and of these three we find it necessary to consider but one, and that is:. Did the proposition for a removal of the county seat receive the required…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Senate of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  2. Slingerland v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. Brisbin v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. Dayton v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re DennyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hopkins v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Town of Eufaula v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Short v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Krakowski v. WaskeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API