Legal Opinion
Rosado v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 2003No. 01 CIV. 3063(VM)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Concepcion Perez Rosado (“Rosado”)commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“ § 405(g)”) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) that denied her application for disability benefits. Rosado alleges errors entitling her to a new administrative hearing. The Commissioner disagrees. Rosado and the Commissioner have filed a motion and cross-motion, respectively, for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Arruda v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Kessler v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Crysler v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Blom v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Newsome v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.