Legal Opinion
Stash, Inc. v. Palmgard International, Inc
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 30, 1996No. Civil K-95-2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Stash, Inc. (“Stash”) instituted this case, seeking a declaratory judgment that certain protective athletic gloves which Stash distributes do not infringe the earlier issued Webster patent. The Webster patent, which is apparently assigned to defendant Palmgard International, Inc. (“Palmgard”), covers an inner baseball glove. Stash also seeks a declaratory judgment that certain claims of the Webster patent are invalid. Palmgard has filed a counter-claim of infringement against Stash and against Carol AJ. Stanley (“Stanley”), a corporate officer…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Centocor, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Safeco Insurance Company of America and Eatherly Construction Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. City of White House, Tennessee, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. City of White HouseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- FieldTurf USA, Inc. v. Sports Construction Group LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007