Urness v. State

Miller, Judge.

A jury found Rhonda Urness guilty of one count of theft by taking. She appeals her conviction and the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial. Urness claims that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of two similar transactions and that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We affirm because the similar transaction evidence was admissible under Williams v. State 1 and because the evidence was sufficient to support her conviction under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia. 2

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant no longer enjoys the…