Legal Opinion

(SS) Nanney v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 28, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00527Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOROTHY NANNEY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00527-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING 13 v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING CASE TO 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY1 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 15 SECURITY, (Doc. Nos. 15, 17) 16 Defendant. 17 18 Dorothy Nanney (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for 20 supplemental…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Treichler v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API