Legal Opinion

Cumbey v. Ueland

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1898No. Nos. 11,002-(73)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by Andreas Ueland, as receiver of Washington Bank, from an order of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Johnson, J., all-owing a claim for $11,422 against the estate of said bank in favor of William N. Cumbey, as assignee of Weitzner, Gruenberg & Co., insolvents.

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. J.'

The here material facts, as disclosed by the record, are: On-March 18, 1895, the firm of Weitzner, G-ruenberg & Co. transferred its stock of merchandise to Peter P. Swensen, and received' therefor his two promissory notes for $5,000 each, with interest at* 8 per cent, per annum, due in four and six months, respectively.. The firm indorsed and transferred these notes to the Washington-Bank, which was then a creditor of the firm to the amount of about $23,000, to be applied as a payment on such indebtedness.. The firm was then insolvent, to the knowledge of the bank, and the -…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re Van NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Marshall v. GilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Hossfeldt v. DillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Hay v. TuttleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Clerihew v. West Side BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geo. A. Hormel Company v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Humphreys v. Minnesota Clay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Morrow v. Peoples State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API