Legal Opinion

Hay v. Tuttle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1896No. Nos. 10,201—(112)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county in favor of plaintiff for $960.36, and adjudging that if defendant should return certain shares of stock the judgment should be satisfied in the sum of $905.88, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Elliott, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff-, as assignee .of one Page, under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors. *57The right of action was predicated on the fourth section of the insolvent law. G. S. 1894, § 4243. The allegations of the complaint were that, within 90 days of making the assignment, Page, being then insolvent, and the defendant knowing that fact, transferred to defendant certain shares of stock as security for a pre-existing debt, with a view of giving defendant a preference; that, after plaintiff had qualified as assignee, he demanded a return and retransfer of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clerihew v. West Side BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  2. Chapman v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  4. Maya Corporation v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1929
  5. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API