Legal Opinion
Scarborough v. West
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided June 14, 2000No. 98-1590PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Before the Court is the appellant’s application, through counsel, for attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $19,333.75, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The Secretary has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and the appellant has filed a response to the Secretary’s motion. For the reason that follows, the Court will dismiss the appellant’s application.
In the underlying litigation, the appellant appealed a July 1998 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board), which determined, inter alia, that a March 1976 regional…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Charles W. Bazalo, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Bazalo v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Chesser v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
4Cited by12 opinions
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Scarborough v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lee v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- Lee v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.