Legal Opinion

Hess v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 24, 1957No. Civ. No. 1708PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, Chief Judge (after stating the facts above).

The two motions, (1) to dismiss the complaint as a class action and (2) to dismiss it for failure to state a claim as to the individuals joining as plaintiffs, are interrelated. Whether the complaint before us be considered as an action by several plaintiffs on their own behalf or as representing themselves and others similarly situated, the fundamental principles of law — those relating to the practices alleged to be in violation of the anti-trust laws of the United States, from which the injuries to plaintiffs are alleged to flow — are…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Foster v. City of Detroit, MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. California League of Independent Insurance Producers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1959
  5. Moss v. Lane Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API