Palen v. Bushnell
New York Supreme Court
On motion for leave to file supplemental answer. This action was originally instituted in 1863 by William Palen, as receiver in supplementary proceedings of Henry Bange, against said Bange and one Ezra L. Bushnell, to whom said Bange was alleged to have conveyed property'in fraud of his creditors. Defendant Bushnell died June 13, 1887, leaving a will by which he appointed Adelaide E., his wife, executrix, and Ezra D. Bushnell and Albert Van Der Werken executors.
Read the full summary
On motion for leave to file supplemental answer. This action was originally instituted in 1863 by William Palen, as receiver in supplementary proceedings of Henry Bange, against said Bange and one Ezra L. Bushnell, to whom said Bange was alleged to have conveyed property'in fraud of his creditors. Defendant Bushnell died June 13, 1887, leaving a will by which he appointed Adelaide E., his wife, executrix, and Ezra D. Bushnell and Albert Van Der Werken executors. At the time of defendant Bushnell’s death the action was pending before a referee, and was subsequently revived against the…
1Opinion of the CourtPatterson, J.
This is an application made on behalf of the executors of JE. L. Bushnell, deceased, for leave to file a supplemental answer in this action, which has been pending in this court for 26 years, and which was brought by the plaintiff, as receiver of the property of Henry Bange, a judgment debtor, to recover certain property, or the value thereof, which it is claimed was unlawfully transferred to Mr. Bushnell in his life-time, the action having originally been brought against him, and, since his death, having been revived against' his personal representatives. Concerning the right of the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Allison's v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Stover v. ChasseNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Pitts v. New Mammoth Gold Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1901