Legal Opinion

Gattman v. Favro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1987No. A8309-05921; CA A37387Published

1Opinion of the Court

739 P.2d 572 (1987)

86 Or.App. 227

Ronald GATTMAN, Appellant,

v.

Neil FAVRO; Buzzard's Roost Tavern, Inc., an Oregon Corporation; and Charles Tibbett, Doing Business under the Assumed Business Name the Sanctuary Tavern, Defendants,

Borrelli Enterprises, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Respondent.

A8309-05921; CA A37387.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 15, 1986.

Decided July 8, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied August 21, 1987.

Review Allowed September 29, 1987.

Wayne Mackeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Des Connall, P.C., Portland.

Peter R.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Donaca v. Curry CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API