Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reese v. Lisotto

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2000No. 2000-0893Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 77.] THE STATE EX REL. REESE, APPELLANT, v. LISOTTO, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Reese v. Lisotto,

2000-Ohio-28.] Mandamus sought to compel common pleas court judge to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law for two rulings denying relator’s postconviction petitions—Dismissal of complaint affirmed. (No. 00-893—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 00CA48. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1988, relator, Joseph Reese, Jr., was convicted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gause v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Fuller v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Reese v. LisottoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API