Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1999No. 99-424PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Sutula had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Fuller’s second petition for postconviction relief. State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 529, 530, 705 N.E.2d 1226, 1227.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Carroll v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Reese v. LisottoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Fuller v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HardingOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API