Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Kemna

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2001No. WD 59181PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Presiding Judge.

Earl Thomas filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court for the sole purpose of challenging his sentencing as a class X offender under § 558.019, RSMo 1986.1 In his petition, Mr. Thomas alleges that the sentencing court exceeded its jurisdiction in sentencing him as a class X offender on five counts of forcible rape, an unclassified felony, since sentence enhancement under § 558.019 applied only to class A and B felonies. Mr. Thomas also alleges that the sentencing court exceeded its jurisdiction in sentencing him as a class X offender on one count…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Simmons v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. LawhornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. Clay v. DormireSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. HillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harry v. KemnaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Bernard Williams v. Doris Falkenrath, Warden, Jefferson City Correctional CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. IN RE: JERRELL BROOKS v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, Warden, South Central Correctional Center, consolidated with IN RE: AARON ROBINSON v. IAN WALLACE, Warden, Southeast Correctional CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API