Legal Opinion

Mers v. Marriott International Group Accidental Death & Dismemberment Plan

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 5, 1996No. 95 C 7543PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MAROVICH, District Judge.

Plaintiff Pamela Hertel Mers (“Mers”) asserts that Defendant Marriott International Group Accidental Death and Dismemberment Plan (the “Plan”) wrongfully denied her claim for benefits under the Plan’s Business Travel Accident Insurance Policy, in which Mers’ deceased husband, Dale Mers, was enrolled. Accordingly, in Count I of her Complaint, Mers seeks payment of those benefits from the Plan pursuant to Section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(i )(B). 1 Now before the Court are the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cady v. Hartford Life & Accidental InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013
  2. Kolowski v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  3. Erbe v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corp. Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Gibbons v. Mony Life Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API