Commonwealth v. Graham
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
Appellant takes this appeal from an order which denied his claim for relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act. Upon review, we find it necessary to reverse the order of the PCHA court and remand the case for a new trial due to the improper and prejudicial closing remarks made by the prosecutor at Appellant’s trial.1
As a result of evidence gathered when the police executed a search warrant at Appellant’s home, Appellant was charged with possession with intent to deliver marijuana, possession of LSD and possession of a prohibited offensive weapon, a sword cane. Charges were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CroninSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989