Commonwealth v. Graham
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LARSEN, Justice.
The issue presented for our consideration by this appeal is whether Superior Court erred in finding ineffectiveness of trial counsel (and thus remanding the matter for a new trial), where trial counsel failed to object when the prosecutor, during closing argument, expressed his personal opinion regarding the credibility of the defendant with respect to certain portions of the defendant’s testimony.
On January 28, 1982, a search warrant was executed at the residence of appellee, Gordon L. Graham, in Cresson, Pennsylvania, by a six-person team of law…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LaCavaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ArchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. GuilfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.