Legal Opinion

Holley v. Schneider

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1985No. Docket 73641PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before us is whether a contingent beneficiary is entitled to life insurance proceeds when the primary beneficiary is disqualified because of divorce and the insurance policy provides only for the passing of a designated beneficiary’s interest when the beneficiary predeceases the insured.

I

On January 25, 1978, decedent Paul F. Powell signed a group insurance enrollment form at his place of employment. He also filled out the accompanying beneficiary card, designating his estranged wife Joyce as primary beneficiary and Sandra L. Holley, a friend, as contingent beneficiary. The Powells…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Starbuck v. City Bank and Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. In Re Seitz EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Doyle v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PearsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  5. Seitz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API