Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 4, 2006No. 00-DR-0299; A122208PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Wife, who prevailed as appellant, see Miller and Miller, 207 Or App 198, 140 P3d 1172 (2006), petitions for reconsideration, asserting that our opinion erroneously failed to address her contention that (as she now styles it) the case “should be remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of [wife’s] request for attorney fees for the modification hearing.” We grant reconsideration and, with the following clarification, adhere to our original opinion and disposition.

In her brief as appellant, wife raised two assignments of error. The first assignment challenged the trial comb’s allowance of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SpillaneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In Re the Marriage of HaleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. In re the Marriage of VanlaninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API