Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Spillane

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 2012No. 0204655CV; A142043PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Wife appeals a supplemental judgment terminating an earlier award of indefinite maintenance spousal support, ORS 107.135. She argues that the trial court erred in terminating support because husband failed to establish that a current, substantial, and unanticipated change in his circumstances warrants termination. Husband contends that his declining health, the loss of a business relationship, and the economic downturn have decreased his income and earning ability so that the termination of spousal support is just and equitable under the circumstances. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) (2007),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of AlbrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of PrattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of CurranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. In re the Marriage of MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of CarletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API