Legal Opinion

Hamilton Manfg. Co. v. Poll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 109, Calendar No. 36,226Published

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This case was originally heard as upon bill for injunction to restrain infringement of a patent, and was so reviewed by this court in 253 Mich. 324, and remanded for more testimony. Further hearing appears to have been upon the same issue, as no other contention was mentioned in the well-considered opinion of the circuit court holding that jurisdiction is in the Federal court.

Counsel for plaintiff concede that the State court has no jurisdiction in an action for infringement of a patent, but now claim that the suit is to enjoin violation and to enforce specific performance of an agreement, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton Manfg. Co. v. Poll.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API