Legal Opinion
Hamilton Manfg. Co. v. Poll.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket No. 66, Calendar No. 35,214PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The bill was filed to enjoin infringement of patent and for other relief. Plaintiff had decree. Defendants have appealed.
The contest was narrowed at the hearing to alleged infringement of claims to an automatic steering device on a planting machine manufactured and sold by plaintiff on which plaintiff has patent No. 1,723,-073. It is thus claimed:
“A frame having a swivel yoke and a caster wheel in said yoke, a guide wheel pivotally connected to said yoke and positioned ahead of said caster wheel and adapted to travel in a guide furrow. ’ ’
Defendants also make and sell planting machines on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ballentine v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Paul v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Rathbun v. Wolverine Metal Specialties Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hamilton Manfg. Co. v. PollMichigan Supreme Court · 1932