Gandy v. THE ROBINSON COMPANY
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
The Chief of Police is not a party, and all parties have consented to the storage of the goods in his possession until a legal determination can be made as to its ownership. There has been no equitable order in the ease, nor has any equitable hearing been held, although the court set such a hearing over two years ago. Certainly the prayer for injunctive relief as to the Chief of Police, who is not a party to the action, can not now be said to make this an equity case since this prayer has been answered by consent and without issue thereon. Overstreet v. Schulman, 203…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burress v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Douglas-Guardian Warehouse Corp. v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Martin v. Home Owners Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Atlanta Finance Company v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Ætna Insurance v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Central Soya Co. v. BundrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Liniado v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991