Legal Opinion

In re Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 31, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1968 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Ithaca.

We grant the motion by petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, to confirm a Referee’s report issued after a hearing and we find respondent guilty of having engaged in a conflict of interest by the circumstances of a loan from a client, in violation of Appellate Division attorney disciplinary rules (see, Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [A] [5]; DR 5-104 [A] [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (5); 1200.23 (a)]).

In May 1993, respondent accepted a loan for $29,000 from a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re SherbuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re ChariffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. In re CoxeterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API