Legal Opinion
Maroney v. City of Malvern
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 5, 1995No. 94-1143PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellants Maroney and Parker own a forty-acre tract of land that lies east of, and abuts, the Southgate subdivision in Malvern. Appellants’ forty-acre tract is outside the city limits, while the Southgate subdivision is inside the City. Appellants contended below that they were entitled to an injunction allowing them to use a road in the Southgate subdivision to get to their forty-acre tract. The chancellor dismissed appellants’ complaint. We affirm..In 1968, James L. Scott developed the Southgate subdivision with the approval of the Malvern Planning Commission.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ferguson v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Gannett River States Publishing Co. v. Arkansas Industrial Development CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Carmical v. Arkansas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Black v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Terry v. LockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Jamison v. Estate of GoodlettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
- Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Black v. Van SteenwykSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.