Legal Opinion

Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. Gherity

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1995No. C3-93-1059, C7-93-1078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

Appellants Kevin L. Daniels (“Daniels”) and Western Surety Company (“Western Surety”) seek review of a court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s judgment in favor of respondent, Edward Gherity (“Gherity”). The issue raised on appeal is whether Daniels, in signing as transferor on an Odometer Statement and Assignment by Seller form, thereby warranted title to the motor vehicle. We conclude he did and affirm.

The facts of this case are largely undisputed. In early 1989, William Kaye (“Kaye”) approached Daniels about purchasing a 1987 Cadillac from Daniels…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arneson v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Welle v. ProzinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Bank North v. SouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Rife v. One 1987 Chevrolet Cavalier, Minnesota License No. 509-CRC, Vin No. 1G1JE111OHJ112508Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of the North v. Automotive Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. City of New Brighton v. 2000 Ford Excursion VIN 1FMNU43S2YEA74156Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API